Who bears responsibility for the Pro-Trump Washington DC riots and why it should worry us in the UK.

After only a couple days after publishing on here my hope that politics might return to some sanity with the end of Donald Trump as United States President. Unfortunately, on the day his time came to an official end, it was realised my hopes were nothing more than wishful thinking.

In the United States, January 6th saw Congress meet to certify the Electoral College vote from Novembers election. Effectively, it would confirm Joe Biden as the victor and the end of Donald Trump’s presidency. There was also to run off in Georgia which saw the Democrats winning both battles and taking control of the Senate as well. With control of the Senate, Congress and the Presidency, this is a good opportunity for the incoming President to legislate as he wants.  read more

Breaking International Law for the sake of Brexit: Where on earth are we headed?

Personally, I think there are more important things to be discussing politically on here at present such as what appears to be out woeful efforts at combating and preventing the further spread of COVID-19. However, Brexit has reared its ugly head back into the public conversation recently and it prompts me to worry even more for the future of the UK. Why? Because a no-deal Brexit [Pictured above are Boris Johnson and Jean Claude Juncker last year; image from Business Insider] which last year which at the moment we appear to be heading for and which I would have labelled disastrous last year but to be coming to that scenario in the middle of a pandemic…I’m lost for words….

Why is it increasingly likely? The government brought forward the Internal Market Bill which aims to ensure that post-Brexit, the UK nations of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have the same standards and rules throughout. At first glance, that’s nothing contentious. It seems perfectly reasonable. However, the bill also says ‘Certain provisions to have effect notwithstanding inconsistency or incompatibility with international or other domestic law’ but also replaces parts of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement as elements of it “cease to be recognised and available in domestic law”. read more